Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: plugins to builtins
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:03:35 +0200
On 06/24/2011 06:47 AM, Andreas wrote:
Am 21.06.2011 08:25, schrieb Jaap Keuter:On 06/21/2011 07:20 AM, Andreas wrote:Moving some dissectors to be built-in probably make sense, as the ABI wasn't as stable as required to guarantee compatibility with bugfix versions (even in stable branches).Please clarify?I must revoke my statement. I did wrong at looking to the history of some files (proto.h) in the trunk instead of the branches. Getting the release snapshots shows that the file changed but keeps compatible. Sorry, Andy
Ok, no harm done. Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: plugins to builtins, (continued)
- Re: plugins to builtins Jaap Keuter (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins mmann78 (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Ulf Lamping (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Roland Knall (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Ulf Lamping (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Roland Knall (Jun 21)
- Re: plugins to builtins Ulf Lamping (Jun 21)
- Re: plugins to builtins Ulf Lamping (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Andreas (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Jaap Keuter (Jun 20)
- Re: plugins to builtins Andreas (Jun 23)
- Re: plugins to builtins Jaap Keuter (Jun 24)