Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Please review: GSEAL fixes: allocation


From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:29:17 -0600

Sure, did you already commit it?  I did quite a bit of -DGSEAL cleanup 
not too long ago.

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Someone willing to review/test this?

Thanks
    Joerg

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:23:41PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I have fixed most of the struct GtkAllocation access errors when building
with -DGSEAL (all occurences except rtp_player.c).
As I really do not understand what I'm doing here, it would be nice if
someone would be willing to review this, especially whether the call to
gtk_widget_get_allocation() is often enough or too often. I have not
spotted any changes in behavior, but I wouldn't really know what to test.

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: