Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 37859: /trunk/ /trunk/gtk/: color_dlg.c /trunk/: color_filters.c color_filters.h

[Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>]

On 4 jul 2011, at 17:57, Guy Harris wrote:

> On Jul 4, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Sake Blok wrote:
>
> > Where do you need that info, in the frame section of the packet details we list the following:
> >
> > Coloring Rule Name: ___tmp_color_filter___01
> > Coloring Rule String: (ip.addr eq 192.168.0.104 and ip.addr eq 208.117.232.170) and (tcp.port eq 50388 and tcp.port 
> > eq 80)
>
> If the rule isn't saved in the colorfilters file, does the rule's name serve any purpose other than to identify the 
> rule in places such as the Frame section of the packet details?  

The rule is saved in the list of colorfilters in memory, but based on the filter-name-prefix it is not saved to the 
colorfilters file. The name of the temporary coloring rule is used to overwrite the filter with a new filter if another 
conversation/field is chosen for the particular temporary color. That's why it has a fixed name prefix and a trailing 
index number. The "fixed" name is also used when clearing the temporary coloring rules (CTRL+SPACE).

Cheers,


Sake


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe