Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [semi-OT] request second opinion on possible bugs in OS TCP window and SACK implementation
From: Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:29:33 +0100
On Jan 16, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Alan Tu wrote:
List, I am looking for a second opinion on what I believe is one or more bugs in inplementation of TCP receive and send window, or selective acknowledgement. On a Nokia S60 device for sure, and possibly on an unidentified server side OS. I don't know where else to find packet gurus. If after reading this and you're interested in helping, please e-mail me individually and I'll reply with the PCAP.
As a future chinese proverb will say: A pcap says more than a thousand words! I'd be happy to take a look at the PCAP and tell you my findings... Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- [semi-OT] request second opinion on possible bugs in OS TCP window and SACK implementation Alan Tu (Jan 16)
- Re: [semi-OT] request second opinion on possible bugs in OS TCP window and SACK implementation Sake Blok (Jan 16)
- Re: [semi-OT] request second opinion on possible bugs in OS TCP window and SACK implementation Sake Blok (Jan 16)