Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:51:16 -0800
On Feb 28, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
My main development plattform is Linux. On it, my plugin get's loaded, everything get's dissected correctly, and works as intended. My plugin is called openSAFETY. On Windows, the SercosIII plugin takes precedence over my plugin. Both register the same Ethertypes, therefore this should not be unusual,
If you mean "it's not unusual that random stuff happens if two dissectors register with the same value in a given dissector table", that is correct. We make no guarantee that this will do what the developer of the dissector, or the user, wants - in particular, we make no guarantee which dissector will win.
So my question is, can I influence the decision made by wireshark in any way, which plugin get's called?
Try disabling the dissector for the protocol whose dissector you don't want called. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Feb 28)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Guy Harris (Feb 28)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Feb 28)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Feb 28)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Feb 28)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Guy Harris (Feb 28)