Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: N in 1 packets
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:44:06 -0800
On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
So if those 16-byte frames have no internal structure (for example, you don't have a time stamp in each frame), but are just like, for example, the line boundaries in a hex dump, my inclination would be to have the pcap module break the byte stream into packets, even if that means that it needs to buffer a partial packet in a case where a 16-byte frame contains the beginning of a packet but not the end of the packet.
This is why I love ARM Ltd so much - they just *love* saying "sorry, *that* document is only available to registered ARM customers": http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ihi0029b/index.html I've inferred from other stuff that I've seen that the CoreSight Architecture Specification documents what the trace messages in question look like. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- N in 1 packets Akos Vandra (Dec 09)
- Re: N in 1 packets Sake Blok (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Akos Vandra (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Akos Vandra (Dec 11)
- Re: N in 1 packets Akos Vandra (Dec 11)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 11)
- Re: N in 1 packets Akos Vandra (Dec 11)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 11)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Sake Blok (Dec 10)
- Re: N in 1 packets Guy Harris (Dec 11)