Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38340: /trunk/ /trunk/: make-version.pl


From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 01:19:54 +0200

On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:33:34PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38340

User: cmaynard

 Don't report svn version if not building from svn.  Change prompted by 
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/5376/wireshark-161-title-shows-svn-rev-unknown-from-unknown.
  +3 -2      make-version.pl    Modified

Does this really make sense? How do you differentiate between the "real"
1.6.1 release and a post 1.6.1 source code archive?
I think this particular "fix" is wrong.

The only way I see to get around that, though, is to have each official  
release (e.g., 1.6.1) have a commit to disable the SVN version noise and  
then another commit to re-enable it after the release is made.

Why not simply include the version.conf file in the tarball, shouldn't that
fix the problem?

What about:

1) put Chris' code back in

I didn't revert it because I may be wrong ;-) so I wanted some discussion
first.

Ciao
      Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: