Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: out of port numbers
From: Andrej van der Zee <andrejvanderzee () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:48:27 +0200
How do you define running out of ports?
Suppose an application needs a port to setup a connection but all port numbers are already taken by other established and time-waited connections.
On *nixes you have to know how the TCP and UDP stacks are configured, and they are all different. I have two Linux box that use 32768-61000,
Yes these are default Linux settings (cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range). I am seeings a lot of port-reuses in the tcpdumps. The tcpdump was captured on a Debian master that runs multiple Debian guests (Linux VServer). Among others, it runs a proxy and application server that setup a new connection for each HTTP request that is being served. Cheers, Andrej ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- out of port numbers Andrej van der Zee (Aug 19)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrew Hood (Aug 19)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrej van der Zee (Aug 19)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrej van der Zee (Aug 22)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrej van der Zee (Aug 31)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrej van der Zee (Aug 19)
- Re: out of port numbers Andrew Hood (Aug 19)