Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c

[Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>]

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:21 PM,  <guy () wireshark org> wrote:
> Log:
>  Say "none" rather than "unknown" if there are no IP addresses; in most
>  if not all cases, it's not that we don't know the IP addresses, it's
>  that there are no IP addresses to know.

What about displaying nothing in the interface list, and "none" in the details?
Like in the attached patch.

BTW, why do we build the same string ("<b>%s</b>\n<span
size='small'>%s</span>") 4 different places?


-- 
Stig Bjørlykke

Attachment: interface-list-no-none.patch
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe