Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?

From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:26:40 -0700


On Apr 3, 2011, at 10:22 AM, damker wrote:

Oh , in 3GPP TS 23.040 the PI is a Mandatory parameter .


Yes.  It's mandatory for both SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR and SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ACK, unlike the FCS, 
which is a Mandatory parameter only for SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Wireshark : checking a new protocol ankit sambyal (Apr 02)
- Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
  - Re: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? Guy Harris (Apr 03)
    - 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
    - Re: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? Guy Harris (Apr 03)
    - 答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
- Re: Wireshark : checking a new protocol Chris Maynard (Apr 04)