Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8

[Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine () jdsu com>]

Sure, but where do I post the capture file to?

Thanks, Barry


On Apr 10, 2011, at 3:02 PM, "wireshark-users-request () wireshark org" <wireshark-users-request () wireshark org> 
wrote:

> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
>    wireshark-users () wireshark org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    wireshark-users-owner () wireshark org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: VoIP RTP Analysis, Lost Packet Analysis (Jake Peavy)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:20:42 -0600
> From: Jake Peavy <djstunks () gmail com>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>    <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] VoIP RTP Analysis, Lost Packet Analysis
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=5Ngzq5OJ6jx51VZ0UegZRRzLLFg () mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Barry Constantine <
> Barry.Constantine () jdsu com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am analyzing VoIP capture files in Wireshark 1.4 and am confused about
> > the RTP analysis results.
> >
> >
> >
> > The jitter results match what I expect, but the packet loss results do not.
> >
> >
> >
> > I know for a fact that the file contains no packet loss and yet the RTP
> > analysis screen reports all packets as lost ?negatively? (and gives an odd
> > -100% value).
> >
> >
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
>
> Can you post a sample capture?
>
> -- 
> -jp
>
> They were a proud people. In fact, some said they were too proud. If you
> asked them why they were so proud, they'd just laugh and say, "We're not
> even going to answer that." Later, they were tied to the bumper of a car and
> dragged around the block, as onlookers shrieked with delight. But one old
> man, who had a banjo, just shook his head and walked away. The crowd noticed
> this and set him on fire.
>
> deepthoughtsbyjackhandey.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20110409/bae58dd6/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users () wireshark org
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8
> **********************************************
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe