Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Display filter for TCP reserved field


From: Marco S. Zuppone <msz () msz eu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:41:53 +0100

Hello,

thanks a lot for your reply! A curiosity:
have you, in your professional experience, ever found a traffic where the reserved field was not 0000 ??
I noticed that in WireShark 1.4 is possible to write a dissector with LUA...is this working well? Seems a great feature 
to me!
 Thanks a lot!! 
Regards,
Marco S. Zuppone
On 29 Sep 2010, at 17:37, Stephen Fisher wrote:

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:17:50PM +0100, Marco Simone Zuppone wrote:

I was wondering how is the best way (if any) to create a filter about 
the reserved ( 4 bits between bit 100 and 104 ) field of the TCP 
packet. The expression as tcp[n:y] == are interesting but n and y are 
expressed in byte and not in bit.

I recently changed the TCP dissector to show the nonce flag and the 
three reserved bits as separate filterable fields.  That change is only 
in the development 1.5.x branch from SVN though.  If you want, you can 
download the lastest automated release from 
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ and use the "tcp.flags.res" 
field.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: