Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: TCAP different upper layer
From: "DROUIN, FLORENT (FLORENT)" <florent.drouin () alcatel-lucent com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:29:05 +0200
Hi, I think it is already implemented. You can check with the sample camel2.pcap on the Wiki. But you need to activate the Service Response Time analyze to keep the AP context, and ,as noticed, the TC Begin must be included in the traces. Regards Florent -----Message d'origine----- De : wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] De la part de Anders Broman Envoyé : vendredi 17 septembre 2010 15:06 À : Developer support list for Wireshark Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] TCAP different upper layer Hi, Currently not, but it should be possible to create a sub dissector table and have Sub dissectors regestering by application-context-name. Of hand I don't remember if The application-context is only there at dialog establishment if so it becomes a bit more complicated as The dialog has to be tracked to find the right subdissector. Dissection would also fail If dialog establisment isn't in the trace. Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of robie.die.katze () gmx at Sent: den 17 september 2010 14:58 To: wireshark-dev () wireshark org Subject: [Wireshark-dev] TCAP different upper layer hello experts, exist a possibility for the tcap dissector to select upper protocols for example with help of the application-context-name and not only with help of subsystem number. thx guenter -- Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- TCAP different upper layer robie . die . katze (Sep 17)
- Re: TCAP different upper layer Anders Broman (Sep 17)
- Re: TCAP different upper layer DROUIN, FLORENT (FLORENT) (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TCAP different upper layer robie . die . katze (Sep 20)
- Re: TCAP different upper layer DROUIN, FLORENT (FLORENT) (Sep 20)
- Re: TCAP different upper layer robie . die . katze (Sep 20)
- Re: TCAP different upper layer Anders Broman (Sep 17)