Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: .so and .la files
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:31:55 -0700
On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Eloy Paris wrote:
Whoops, sorry for replying to myself but I just realized that you're talking about a plugin, which is something that perhaps is "loaded via libltdl in a way that requires that meta-information [in the .la file]".
We don't use libltdl to load plugins - we use GLib's wrappers around the native run-time loader - so the .la file probably isn't needed. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: building my dissector on linux, (continued)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Jeff Morriss (Oct 05)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Brian Oleksa (Oct 05)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Jeff Morriss (Oct 05)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Brian Oleksa (Oct 05)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Anders Broman (Oct 05)
- Re: building my dissector on linux Brian Oleksa (Oct 05)
- .so and .la files Brian Oleksa (Oct 05)
- Re: .so and .la files Eloy Paris (Oct 05)
- Re: .so and .la files Eloy Paris (Oct 05)
- Re: .so and .la files Brian Oleksa (Oct 05)
- Re: .so and .la files Guy Harris (Oct 05)