Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:21:00 -0700
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
TYou can also try building "--with-plugins=no"
...which you might have to do *anyway* if you want a static build: "static" means "100% static" (rather than "statically link with some libraries), and "100% static" means, at least on some UN*Xes, "no support for run-time loading of code". ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Building pruned-down version of tshark Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan (Oct 25)
- Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark Christopher Maynard (Oct 25)
- Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark Guy Harris (Oct 25)
- Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan (Oct 25)
- Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark Stephen Fisher (Oct 26)
- Re: Building pruned-down version of tshark Christopher Maynard (Oct 25)