Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: HTTP not decoded
From: M Holt <m.iostreams () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:05:25 -0700
Well, it's not that it's not showing it correctly, it's just showing you the one packet that is in the capture. The decode is done properly, but to change the way you are viewing it, you would need to adjust the setting I mentioned previously. -- Mike On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Srivats P. <pstavirs () gmail com> wrote:
Thanks Mike! In other words, if the capture file contained all packets of the TCP connection, Wireshark would have decoded and shown HTTP correctly - right? Srivats ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- HTTP not decoded Srivats P (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Marco Simone Zuppone (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded M Holt (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Srivats P . (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded M Holt (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Srivats P . (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Prigge Scott (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Prigge Scott (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Sake Blok (Nov 03)
- Re: HTTP not decoded Srivats P . (Nov 03)