Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Filter for generated items
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:45:42 -0700
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:13:57PM +0100, Helge Kruse wrote:
But I cannot convince anybody to update there 1.2.x installations to 1.4.x. So I must now decide if I have to provide a DLL compile with the 1.2.x header and libs and an additional DLL compiled with the 1.4.x header and libs. I don't think about the development branches (1.3.x).
Yes, then making DLL of your plugin for version 1.2.x and 1.4.x would be the way to go. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Filter for generated items, (continued)
- Re: Filter for generated items Guy Harris (Nov 14)
- Re: Filter for generated items Helge Kruse (Nov 15)
- Re: Filter for generated items Stephen Fisher (Nov 15)
- Re: Filter for generated items Joerg Mayer (Nov 15)
- Re: Filter for generated items Jaap Keuter (Nov 15)
- Re: Filter for generated items Helge Kruse (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Stephen Fisher (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Stephen Fisher (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Jaap Keuter (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Helge Kruse (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Stephen Fisher (Nov 16)
- Re: Filter for generated items Helge Kruse (Nov 18)
- Re: Filter for generated items Stephen Fisher (Nov 18)
- Re: Filter for generated items Guy Harris (Nov 14)
- Re: Filter for generated items wsgd (Nov 16)