Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: remote capture framework
From: Morty <morty+wireshark () frakir org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:34:22 -0400
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:54:34PM -0700, Phil Paradis wrote:
I'm not sure about the timestamp issue; all of our capture boxes are Windows-based, so I've never really played with a long-running capture on Linux.
How long did you have to leave it running before seeing the problem on Windows? I've left dumpcap running on a Linux box for 5 days, started a big download, and am seeing minimal time differences. Methodology: dumpcap -w test.pcap -b filesize:1024 -b files:5 > /dev/null 2>&1 & # wait 5 days # kick off big download tcpdump -nr $(ls -1rt *.pcap|tail -1)|tail -1; date +%H:%M:%S.%N The delta between the tcpdump and the current date+time is about 10ms on my box, which is about what it was when I kicked this off 5 days ago. Is 5 days long enough to prove that this isn't a problem under Linux, or does it need to stay longer? - Morty ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- remote capture framework Morty (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Phil Paradis (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Phil Paradis (May 14)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 14)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 17)
- Re: remote capture framework Phil Paradis (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Max P (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 13)
- Re: remote capture framework Max P (May 14)
- Re: remote capture framework Morty (May 13)