Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: The capturefile appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Fileshas 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535)


From: "Gianluca Varenni" <gianluca.varenni () cacetech com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:17:49 -0700



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sake Blok" <sake () euronet nl>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:02 PM
To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Cc: "Gianluca Varenni" <gianluca.varenni () cacetech com>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capturefile  appears to      be      damaged orcorrupt.(pcap: Fileshas       
109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535)

Gianluca,

I have checked the code in dumpcap and if I understand things correctly, 
in the function capture_loop_dispatch, a call is made to pcap_dispatch. In 
this call, capture_loop_cb is supplied as packet-handler.

When I check capture_loop_cb, it will call libpcap_write_packet and 
libpcap_write_packet will actually write the pcap-header to the output 
file as follows:

       rec_hdr.incl_len = phdr->caplen;
       rec_hdr.orig_len = phdr->len;
       nwritten = fwrite(&rec_hdr, 1, sizeof rec_hdr, fp);

the phdr struct is passed on from capture_loop_cb to libpcap_write_packet 
unaltered. So in my understanding pcap_dispatch must have supplied a wrong 
value of phdr->caplen for it to to faultly written to file. However this 
contradicts with the fact that the whole packet is indeed written after 
the header, because the following code should have trimmed the data to 
phr->caplen:

      nwritten = fwrite(pd, 1, phdr->caplen, fp);

This is what I was expecting. In the corrupted file, what the is value of 
the "len" field?

GV



So I'm puzzled...

... and also not too familiar with this part of the code and/or the 
WinPcap libraries...

Cheers,
Sake




On 17 mei 2010, at 20:07, Gianluca Varenni wrote:

It's my understanding that dumpcap uses its own custom code to create 
PCAP
files. The only case that might cause a corrupted capture file is that 
when
a packet is received with pcap_next_ex (or whatever other function is 
used
by dumpcap), pcap_pkthdr::len < pcap_pkthdr::caplen, and even in this 
case,
I'm not sure if this would cause a corrupted file.

Have a nice day
GV

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sake Blok" <sake () euronet nl>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:44 AM
To: "Community support list for Wireshark" 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capturefile appears to be damaged 
orcorrupt.(pcap: Fileshas 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 
65535)

Hi Joseph,

If you look at the last packet of the tracefile that can be read by
Wireshark (frame 1407), you can see that the capture length is set to 98
bytes, while there were 102 bytes on the wire. However, you were not 
using
a snap length and the tracefile actually contains all 102 bytes. This
looks like a bug in WinPcap. Which version of WinPcap are you using? I'm
not sure but I believe there were some issues with earlier 64 bit 
versions
of WinPcap.

Cheers,


Sake

On 17 mei 2010, at 16:25, Joseph Laibach wrote:

Here is one of the files that loads and tells me the file is corrupt.

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Laibach
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged 
or
corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of
65535)

So I made the changes and once the network traffic starts picking up I
get corrupted files again. Traffic is about 60MBit/sec.

Here is the command I'm running now:

C:\"Program Files"\Wireshark\dumpcap.exe -i
\Device\NPF_{21741AFC-E45E-46A6-9740-9E233E4FF91D} -w 
d:\SFTI_capture -b
files:20000 -b filesize:8192 -B 256

Thanks again

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Laibach
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 11:47 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged 
or
corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of
65535)

Thanks for catching it. I should be using the -b filesize:8192 instead.
I'll make the changes and see what happens.

Thanks

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Sake Blok
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged 
or
corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of
65535)

Hmmm... reading back all the mails I see that you use:

dumpcap ... -b files:10000 -a filesize:8192 ...

Why are you mixing -b and -a options?  "-a" options are for automatic
finishing the capturing and "-b" options are for creating a ringbuffer.
Which of the two were you planning to use?

If sticking to one of these two options does not solve the issue, are 
you
able to share a file that is giving the error?

Cheers,
Sake



On 14 mei 2010, at 17:11, Joseph Laibach wrote:

I open the file on the host that is was captured on, or I copy it via 
a
Windows file share. Either way it gives me the same error. I'm 
capturing
stock Market multicast data, if that matters. The traffic is very 
bursty
and the data rate is around 200mb/sec. I switched from a Broadcom NIC 
to
Intel NIC to see if that would help but no luck on that change either.

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Sake Blok
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:49 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged 
or
corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of
65535)

Did you open the file on the host on which it was captured? Or did you
transfer the file from the capturing host to the host on which you try
to read it? The error message that you get usually appears after the
file has been transferred to another host with FTP in ASCII mode 
instead
of BINARY mode.

(FYI dumpcap writes libpcap based files which can not contain packets
larger than 65535 bytes, so the file is most probably corrupted 
somehow)

Cheers,
Sake

On 14 mei 2010, at 16:36, Joseph Laibach wrote:

Is there a way to remove the 65535 maximum from the reading of a
capture?

Thanks

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Laibach
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged
or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum 
of
65535)

I'm running version 1.2.7 64bit.

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Jaap 
Keuter
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged
or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum 
of
65535)

But what release of Wireshark are you using?

Thanks,
Jaap

Send from my iPhone

On 11 mei 2010, at 16:37, Joseph Laibach <jlaibach () schonfeld com>
wrote:

I am having an issue with some of the capture files. Some captures
files spit back an error that the capture file appears to be damaged
or corrupt. The capture is running on a Windows 2003 Sever R2 64bit,
with 2 gigs of memory and a Inetl Xeon 2.33ghz processor.



I am capturing with dumpcap. The syntax I am using is as follows: C:
\"Program Files"\Wireshark\dumpcap.exe -i \Device\NPF_
{ECC9D35A-826A-4A4F-B634-656EAD4EC7C9} -w d:\SFTI_capture -b files:
10000 -a filesize:8192 -B 128 -s 10000000



I added the -s 10000000 to try and fix the large byte packet issue b
ut that hasn't worked.



Anyone have any suggestions on how to eliminated the corruption of
capture files?



Thanks



Joe Laibach




This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official
confirmation.  Market prices and other information are not
guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change
without notice.  Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail
address.
___________________________________________________________________________


Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org

Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to
completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.
Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content 
of
all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to
completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.
Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content 
of
all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to
completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.
Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content 
of
all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to 
completeness
or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.  Schonfeld Group
reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages 
sent
to or from this e-mail address.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to 
completeness
or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.  Schonfeld Group
reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages 
sent
to or from this e-mail address.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not
intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation.
Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to 
completeness
or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.  Schonfeld Group
reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages 
sent
to or from this e-mail address.
<SFTI_capture_09969_20100517094319>___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: