Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 32822: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-q708.c
From: Gerasimos Dimitriadis <gedimitr () otenet gr>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 01:42:03 +0300
Anders Broman wrote:
I'm sure the GSM/UMTS related dissectors would benefit especially if "index method" can be used. Asn2wrs should perhaps be changed to use the new method. I just don't have the traces nor time to so benchmarking. Regards Anders
Yes, going to O(1) will definitely make a big difference. I can find/create some traces with DTAP, BSSMAP and MAP mix of traffic, and try to measure the difference in performance Regards, Gerasimos ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 32822: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-q708.c Gerasimos Dimitriadis (May 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 32822: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-q708.c Anders Broman (May 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 32822: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-q708.c Gerasimos Dimitriadis (May 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 32822: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-q708.c Anders Broman (May 15)