Wireshark mailing list archives

Previous By Date Next
Previous By Thread Next

Re: tshark (Windows) not working

From: Abhik Sarkar <sarkar.abhik () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 07:44:26 +0400
It's still the same, Gerald :(

E:\wireshark-src>grep 32697 *
tshark.c: * $Id: tshark.c 32697 2010-05-06 23:51:37Z gerald $

E:\wireshark-src>dumpcap -i 6
The capture session could not be initiated ().

Please check that "\Device\NPF_{96896B6D-2F50-4415-B46F-6A59A1382DB1}" is
the pr
oper interface.


Help can be found at:

       http://wiki.wireshark.org/WinPcap
       http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup


E:\wireshark-src>

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:


Can you try r32697?

Abhik Sarkar wrote:

I get the same error with dumpcap as well.

I went back to 32687 (there seem to be some major changes to dumpcap in
32688) and dumpcap works, but tshark gives the original error I reported:
E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>dumpcap -i 2
File: C:\DOCUME~1\sarkara\LOCALS~1\Temp\wiresharkXXXXa01288
Packets: 31 Packets dropped: 0

E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>tshark -i 2
Capturing on Intel(R) 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection
**
ERROR:column-utils.c:879:???: code should not be reached

E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>

Then, I went back to 32682 (there are changes in 32683 to column-utils)
and now it works at least.

So, I am staying here for now!

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Abhik Sarkar <sarkar.abhik () gmail com
<mailto:sarkar.abhik () gmail com>> wrote:

    Hi Joan,

    I am getting that error on both tshark and Wireshark with my build
    (32727) on Windows (32 bit). I tried doing a distclean;
    verify_tools; setup and build. It compiles without error, but
    refuses to capture. Looks like I chose a bad time to code a few
    changes ;-)

    I haven't got around to investigating the issue in detail (yet)... I
    hope someone beats me to it.

    Regards,
    Abhik


    On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, j.snelders <j.snelders () telfort nl
    <mailto:j.snelders () telfort nl>> wrote:

        Hi all,

        SVN 32686
        I get the same error (column-utils.c:879:???) running TShark on:
        64-bit Windows 7, build 7600
        64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2, build 7600


        SVN 32692 and higher (the latest version I tried is SVN-32727):
        Unable to capture with Wireshark and TShark, because "The
        capture session
        could not be initiated ()" on:
        64-bit Windows 7, build 7600
        64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2, build 7600
        Windows XP Service Pack 3, build 2600

        $ tshark -D
        1. \Device\NPF_{E859D76E-155B-4512-ACB6-B1B2A07914DB} (Intel(R)
        PRO/1000
        MT Network Connection)

        $ tshark -i 1
        Capturing on Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
        tshark: The capture session could not be initiated ().

        Please check that
        "\Device\NPF_{E859D76E-155B-4512-ACB6-B1B2A07914DB}" is
        the proper interface.
        Help can be found at:
              http://wiki.wireshark.org/WinPcap
              http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup
        0 packets captured

        Any ideas?

        Thanks
        Joan

        On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:37:13 -0400 Chris Maynard wrote:
        Yes, I?m seeing the same thing on Windows with the same SVN
        version, 32686.

        From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
        On Behalf Of Abhik Sarkar
        Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:00 AM
        To: Developer support list for Wireshark
        Subject: [Wireshark-dev] tshark (Windows) not working

        Hi All,

        I can't get tshark to work anymore. I get this error:
        E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>tshark -i 2
        Capturing on Intel(R) 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection
        **
        ERROR:column-utils.c:879:???: code should not be reached

        E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>

        It seems to be related to the changes related to the timestamps
        which Stig
        has been working on. Is anyone else facing issues?

        I am on revision 32686.

        Thanks,
        Abhik.






___________________________________________________________________________

        Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list
        <wireshark-dev () wireshark org <mailto:wireshark-dev () wireshark org



        Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
        Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
                    mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
        <mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe




------------------------------------------------------------------------



___________________________________________________________________________

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org

?subject=unsubscribe


--
Join us for Sharkfest ’10! · Wireshark® Developer and User Conference
Stanford University, June 14-17 · http://www.cacetech.com/sharkfest.10/
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Previous By Date Next
Previous By Thread Next

Current thread: