Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: capture filter with multiple vlans
From: Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:54:39 +0100
On 4 mrt 2010, at 19:03, Gerald Combs wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Filonenko Alexander-AAF013 wrote:Are there any tricks to handle more than one vlan?Unfortunately, none that I know of.Would something like vlan and ( ether[14] & 0xfff == 101 or ether[14] & 0xfff == 201 ) work?
Yes, I was testing something like that too and it works: vlan and (ether[14:2]&0x0fff = 102 or ether[14:2]&0x0fff = 103) Cheers, Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- capture filter with multiple vlans Filonenko Alexander-AAF013 (Mar 04)
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Guy Harris (Mar 04)
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Gerald Combs (Mar 04)
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Sake Blok (Mar 04)
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Gerald Combs (Mar 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Filonenko Alexander-AAF013 (Mar 10)
- Re: capture filter with multiple vlans Guy Harris (Mar 04)