Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
From: Tal Bar-Or <tbaror () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:04:11 +0200
Hi, Rechecking we don't have full /auto mismatch, but ant way here is attached chopped and reduced to 10% size cap of the slow ftp transfer. Thanks On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Hansang Bae <for_list_hbae () nyc rr com>wrote:
Tal Bar-Or wrote:Hi, Even with EDITCAP the trace file is stay large size 190MB and with zip so cant send it, so will send only the expert info images. BTW, i changed the nic to Intel Pro 1000 PT Dual port and the problem solved so we have to change nic on another 14 servers.I meant a small sample. But are you sure you didn't have a duplex mismatch? or did you try updating the drivers? -- Thanks, Hansang ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
slow-ftp_trans-choped.zip
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE Tal Bar-Or (Jan 01)
- Re: Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE Hansang Bae (Jan 01)
- Re: Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE Tal Bar-Or (Jan 03)
- Re: Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE Hansang Bae (Jan 01)