Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: getting the time


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:23:56 -0800


On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:00 PM, philippe alarcon wrote:

You are right.
Your solution is  more appropriate in this case.

Ideally, there would be a way to somehow control the precision reported for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME and FT_RELATIVE_TIME 
values, so that something doesn't get shown with more decimal places than it deserves (a time stamp with one-second 
resolution should show no fractional part, a time stamp with millisecond resolution should show no more than 3 digits 
of a fractional part, etc.).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: