Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: getting the time
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:23:56 -0800
On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:00 PM, philippe alarcon wrote:
You are right. Your solution is more appropriate in this case.
Ideally, there would be a way to somehow control the precision reported for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME and FT_RELATIVE_TIME values, so that something doesn't get shown with more decimal places than it deserves (a time stamp with one-second resolution should show no fractional part, a time stamp with millisecond resolution should show no more than 3 digits of a fractional part, etc.). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: string manipulation, (continued)
- Re: string manipulation Gerald Combs (Jan 25)
- Re: string manipulation Guy Harris (Jan 25)
- Re: string manipulation Brian Oleksa (Jan 25)
- Re: string manipulation Guy Harris (Jan 25)
- Re: string manipulation Anders Broman (Jan 25)
- Re: getting the time philippe alarcon (Jan 21)
- Re: getting the time Guy Harris (Jan 21)
- Re: getting the time Guy Harris (Jan 21)
- Re: getting the time philippe alarcon (Jan 21)
- Re: getting the time Guy Harris (Jan 21)