Wireshark mailing list archives
Move from C89 to C99?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:03:23 +0100
Hello, with Wireshark being more than 10 years old and e.g. requiring glib2/gtk2, maybe it would be OK to move the coding requirements from C89 to C99. This would give us // comments, inline keywords and the like. What do you think? ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Move from C89 to C99? Joerg Mayer (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Guy Harris (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Joerg Mayer (Jan 19)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Gerald Combs (Jan 19)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Guy Harris (Jan 18)