Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: nfs attrs
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:09:55 -0800
On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
This works, is there a way to reduce the size of my dump? Basically, I just want these stats but really not the data.
Which stats do you want? If you want the names of the files being referred to, you *need* the data, so that the file names and file handles are in the capture! Note that snoop, by default, *does* capture the full packet, so that, for example, the lookups included the file name arguments: 11 0.00033 tarsus -> inchun NFS C LOOKUP2 FH=FA14 data2 ... 15 0.00035 tarsus -> inchun NFS C LOOKUP2 FH=FA14 data1 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)