Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Bad TCP - Why ?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:40:40 -0800
On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Forthofer Russ wrote:
I don't believe it is necessarily indicating a problem
Then the rule name should probably be changed, as not all tcp.analysis.flags bits indicate that there's something "bad" about the packet. Perhaps there was a time when all the flags did indicate a problem, and the rule was created and named then. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Bad TCP - Why ? Steve Smith (Feb 18)
- Re: Bad TCP - Why ? Forthofer Russ (Feb 18)
- Re: Bad TCP - Why ? Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: Bad TCP - Why ? Wes (Feb 18)
- Re: Bad TCP - Why ? Forthofer Russ (Feb 18)