Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: intermitant trafffic


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:06:45 +0100

Hi,

He actually means dumpcap. Tshark, also a commandline tool, will do dissection as well, something you want to avoid in long term capture.

You do want to use multiple files though, to keep things managable.

Thanks,
Jaap

Send from my iPhone

On 15 feb 2010, at 18:30, "Terry Martin" <tmartin () timedatacorp com> wrote:

The best way I know is to setup a constant capture using Tshark where it is running and saves capture files. Then when you are notified, you can go back to that capture file and see what is going on



Terry Martin

VP of Operation

TimeData Corporation

Phone: 503-678.2224

Cell:      503.318.8909







From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users- bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Ref Frazer
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 8:46 PM
To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] intermitant trafffic



I am a new user to wireshark. I have this problem where my network is experiences a surge in traffic, but by the time I get to the protocol analyzer the data is gone. What is the best way to capture this window with wireshark?



___________________________________________________________________________


Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org >
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: