Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev31832: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/:packet-sflow.c


From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:47:17 +0100

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:37:51PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote:
Well stating your doubts and position didn't take that long did it :-)
Still do you propose to revert the checkin I don't mind either way...
I thought the current version had merit over the old one, if not it should
be reverted.

Well, the patch has its good and weak aspects - all in all with the bugfixing
that already went into the new dissector we should leave it in - it
seems to contain more improvements than regressions.

 ciao
    Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: