Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking?

["Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () GTECH COM>]

No, thank you!
- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Henry Ludemann
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:26 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Suggestions for dissectors in need of
reworking?

On 9 February 2010 23:46, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
wrote:
> Here's one that's not yet supported:
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200805/msg00058.html
> I've never had the time to work on it and likely never will at this
> point.

Sounds interesting... having tests available is useful
(https://fi.dev.java.net/source/browse/fi/RoundTripTests/).

Thanks!
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe