Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?

[Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>]

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:

> In addition to Christopher Maynard's suggestions, the surest way to 
> fix it is to make both dissectors "new-style" so that they verify that 
> the traffic on the port they're registered on (3503) is the right 
> traffic they're expecting and kick it back to Wireshark so that 
> another dissector can be tried....

I forgot to write:

... if it isn't the right protocol for that dissector
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe