Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [work in progress / stuck] improved dissection for VNC (correct hextile encoding, correct desegmentation)


From: Kaul <mykaul () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:06:40 +0200

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Christopher Maynard <
Chris.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:

Kaul <mykaul@...> writes:

Hi,Attached please find an incomplete, work-in-progress improved
dissection of
the VNC protocol.

Hi Kaul, I think it would be better to open a bug report for this and
submit the
patches there.  That way, the patches won't be forgotten.


Indeed, good idea - I've attached it to the already open
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 .
In addition, already submitted parts of the work via a different bugzilla
entry (patch applicable to the current dissector) and plan to follow up with
another two or so patches.
Y.




___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: