Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:42:35 -0400
Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Hi, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:48:41PM +0800, Tamás Reg?s wrote:In README.developer it says the general rules: static hf_register_info hf[] = { { &hf_PROTOABBREV_FIELDABBREV, { "FIELDNAME", "PROTOABBREV.FIELDABBREV", FIELDTYPE, FIELDBASE, FIELDCONVERT, BITMASK, "FIELDDESCR", HFILL } } }; In proto.h the FIELDBASE declared as enum: typedef enum { BASE_NONE, /**< none */ BASE_DEC, /**< decimal */ BASE_HEX, /**< hexadecimal */ BASE_OCT, /**< octal */ BASE_DEC_HEX, /**< decimal (hexadecimal) */ BASE_HEX_DEC, /**< hexadecimal (decimal) */ BASE_CUSTOM /**< call custom routine (in ->strings) to format */ } base_display_e;If you are using FT_BOOLEAN, it's no longer BASE_* enum, but number of field bits.From proto.h:int display; /**< one of BASE_, or number of field bits for FT_BOOLEAN */
To clarify slightly: The 'display'comment should actually be something like "... or number of field bits for FT_BOOLEAN if BITMASK is non-zero". From README.developer "For FT_BOOLEAN fields that are also bitfields (i.e. 'bitmask' is non-zero), 'display' is used to tell the proto_tree how wide the parent bitfield is." "With integers this is not needed since the type of integer itself (FT_UINT8, FT_UINT16, FT_UINT24, FT_UINT32, etc.) tells the proto_tree how wide the parent bitfield is.". and "Additionally, BASE_NONE is used for 'display' as a NULL-value. That is, for non-integers other than FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME fields, and non-bitfield FT_BOOLEANs, you'll want to use BASE_NONE in the 'display' field. You may not use BASE_NONE for integers. I've updated the comment in proto.h. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Boolean Field Registration Qurey Tamás Regõs (Apr 14)
- Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey Jakub Zawadzki (Apr 15)
- Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey Bill Meier (Apr 15)
- Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey Bill Meier (Apr 15)
- Re: Boolean Field Registration Qurey Jakub Zawadzki (Apr 15)