Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: 4 extra ports opened
From: M K <gedropi () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:50:13 -0800
Low end machine for the time being. Windows 2000 SP4, OEM version. WS Version 1.0.9 (SVN Rev 29911) I am confused. I can ping 127.0.0.1 and my proxy is bound to the localhost, yet when I go into Device Mgr > Hardware, indeed, there is no loopback listed!? Just as you said. So what actually am I pinging and what is my proxy actually bound to? Thank you for this information. On 4/1/10, Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com> wrote:
You haven't said what platform you are running on, but in the out-of-the-box Wireshark on Windows the loopback interface doesn't exist (it does on other platforms) http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Loopback <http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Loopback> Regards, Martin MartinVisser99 () gmail com On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM, M K <gedropi () gmail com> wrote:I I realized that WS was picking up traffic off the hardware interface, but was unsure if in the promiscuous mode, it could/should also pick up software interfaces (127.0.0.1). Curious about the Password Manager reference since FF does not request pws. So my question is: Which passwords? I will look into that. Again thanks. On 4/1/10, Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com> wrote:This is a known requirement for Firefox on non-UNIX systems -https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox+makes+unrequested+connections#Loopback_connection. Googling elsewhere indicates it is to do with the password manager. And besides, as it is only bound to 127.0.0.1, this is the loopbackaddressonly reachable from the machine itself. So for you there is no risk (a case of too much knowledge can bring on unfound fear) Regards, Martin MartinVisser99 () gmail com On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, M K <gedropi () gmail com> wrote:Currently I am using Firefox browser manually configured to have all traffic use a single port thru my proxy. However, when I launch a browser, FF opens four additional, consecutive ports (127.0.0.1:extra ports) as seen with netstat. In WS, when I search for these four additional ports I do not find them. Not an expert so could someone please enlighten me. I hate to have anything invisible. Thanks -- All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. ~Edmund Burke___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe-- All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. ~Edmund Burke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
-- All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. ~Edmund Burke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: 4 extra ports opened Martin Visser (Apr 01)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened M K (Apr 01)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened Martin Visser (Apr 01)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened M K (Apr 02)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened Martin Visser (Apr 02)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened M K (Apr 03)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened Martin Visser (Apr 01)
- Re: 4 extra ports opened M K (Apr 01)