Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket

From: Peter Ross <pross () xvid org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:23:48 +1100

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:56:46AM -0700, Gustavo wrote:

Da: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>

What exactly do you want to feed into the other tool?


Possibly XML (pdml).


[...]

digging Wireshark code to find the best place (and way) to insert the
socket part, but first I was wondering if someone already had the same
problem, as it seems a common issue for using Wireshark with commercial
sw.


Why sockets? Wireshark already provides a stable plugin API.

-- Peter
(A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 AC40 DD6B)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Gustavo (Oct 15)
- Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Jeff Morriss (Oct 15)
  - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Stephen Fisher (Oct 15)
    - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Eloy Paris (Oct 15)
  - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Gustavo (Oct 16)
    - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Peter Ross (Oct 16)
    - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Jaap Keuter (Oct 16)
    - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Jeff Morriss (Oct 16)
    - Re: Redirecting Wireshark output through a socket Gustavo (Oct 19)