Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Need advice on modifying tvb


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:57:01 +0100

Hi,

What's wrong with tvb_new_subset() ?

Thanks,
Jaap

Beth wrote:
I am trying to rewrite an existing dissector for a proprietary protocol 
that, in fact, is only a slight variation on a standard protocol that is 
supported by a builtin Wireshark dissector.

The proprietary frame begins with some special fields, followed by a 
normal frame of the standard protocol BUT the checksum at the end of the 
normal frame is recalculated to reflect the extra bytes at the 
beginning.  So while I can easily write a small dissector that parses 
the initial extra fields (and have done so), I cannot simply pass the 
rest of the buffer to the builtin dissector since then the checksum will 
be wrong.

My question is:  What is the "right" way to fix that checksum in Wireshark?

I've experimented with several strategies.  The tvb_composite functions 
would appear to be ideal, but I can't get them to work for some reason.  
So at the moment I use tvb_memdup to put the data for the normal frame 
into an array, fix the bytes of the checksum, and then use 
tvb_new_real_data to create a new tvb to pass to the builtin 
dissector.   That strategy mostly works: the builtin dissector dissects 
the right fields and doesn't complain about the checksum, but the 
display isn't quite right.  When I select a field in the display tree, 
the wrong bytes are highlighted.  I could fix that by figuring out what 
internal field of the tvb (or packet_info) needs to be tweaked... but 
the fact that I would have to do that tells me that maybe I'm not going 
about this the right way.  Generally whenever I find myself needing to 
work around the Wireshark API, it means I'm using it wrong.  ;)

Those of you who are experienced Wireshark developers, what would you 
suggest?

Thanks,
b.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: