Wireshark mailing list archives
Appropriate action on a protocol failure?
From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren () jcwren com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:24:09 -0500
My protocol payloads consists of one or more TLV (Type-Length-Values) sequences. The dissector decodes the various TLVs. Values represent various parameters to a commands. Right now if a value is out of range, I use DISSECTOR_ASSERT() for the test. I know this isn't the best way to do it, but I don't know what it is. I do want to stop decoding the packet at this point, since it's likely everything following it is munged. What's the suggestion course of action here? Thanks! --jc
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Appropriate action on a protocol failure? J.C. Wren (Nov 09)
- Re: Appropriate action on a protocol failure? Guy Harris (Nov 10)