Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: USB dissection
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:06:27 -0700
On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:57 AM, paul () wsh sbrk co uk wrote:
Thanks. So at the moment packet-usb.c registers usb.bulk and usb.control dissector tables. I would also register usb.vendor and usb.vendor- product perhaps too, and then instead of calling dissector_add("usb.bulk", 0xffff, h) I'd now call dissector_add("usb.vendor-product", 0xaaaabbbb, h) where aaaa is the vendor and bbbb is the product. Does that sound about right?
Yes. Steve ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- USB dissection paul (Dec 12)
- Re: USB dissection Maynard, Chris (Dec 16)
- Re: USB dissection paul (Dec 16)
- Re: USB dissection Stephen Fisher (Dec 16)
- Re: USB dissection paul (Dec 17)
- Re: USB dissection Stephen Fisher (Dec 17)
- Re: USB dissection paul (Dec 17)
- Re: USB dissection Maynard, Chris (Dec 16)