Re: what happened to the web testing methodology

[Mads Rasmussen <mads () opencs com br>]

Glyn Geoghegan wrote:
> Much of the technical content from the original guide has been/is being
> edited and integrated into the forthcoming new ones.

Yes that's noticeable, I still think though that the original document 
had a more methodology feeling to it though by no means anything finished.

You have no idea how many requests I have received for Endlers original 
document, it was released as a methodology. The two testing documents 
that you currently are working on bears no such title nor objective if I 
have understood it correctly.

It's difficult to do a methodology, but I think it would be fruitful to 
begin such a document after we have the two testing documents in house.

Part 1 is still kind of confuse I think, what is its objective? I see it 
as an introduction to testing web applications but it doesn't say much.

Part 2 on the other hand I understand will be what to test for and how.

In my opinion, only when these two documents are finished, a methodology 
 can be established.

> The versions around before the project was paused (0.7, 0.6) were still very
> much in the pre-production phase (as I'm sure you'll see from the swathes of
> yellow highlights and margins full of 'must write this bit'!).

Yes very much so

Congratulations on your session guide btw, very nice work!

> Glyn.
--
Mads Rasmussen, M.Sc.
Open Communications Security
www.opencs.com.br
+55 11 3345 2525