Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: mac duplication
From: "fooler" <fooler () skyinet net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:17:29 +0800
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimi Thompson" <jimit () myrealbox com> To: <vuln-dev () securityfocus com> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 8:33 AM Subject: Re: mac duplication
Dev, You seem to need some clarification about how Ethernet actually works. I'm going to try to toss out a 50,000 foot view. Anyone can feel free to add to this or correct me.
hi jimi, i would like to add and correct some of your statement....
Host names map to IP addresses via DNS.
correct
IP address map to MAC addresses via router tables.
it is most appropriate to say ip addresses map to mac address via arp table
Just as your IP address has to be unique in order to be routable, so does your MAC address.
every network device that is using ethernet has a mac address and should be unique too.... unlike with ip address which is routable, mac address is not....
MAC addresses are purchased in blocks by the people who make network devices and blown on to what amount to EPROMS and attached to network cards, switch ports, etc. No two ethernet cards on the planet should have the same MAC address (emphasis on SHOULD because I've run into cards with duplicated MAC's and you won't believe the havoc this wreaks). This is used as a physical layer address by things like ARP.
two the same mac address is bad if they advertise it on the same time but two the same mac address advertise one at a time is considered good... this is usually happen for highly availability and reliability active-standby setup where the standby network device takes over the mac address of the active device when the active device fails....
If you want to sniff traffic to a particular machine, get yourself a hub (NOT a switch) and plug the switch into the uplink on the hub and your sniffer and sniff-ee into the hub ports. This will A) let you see everything and B) not cause any serious problems for your switch. I hope that no one was using the machine you were trying to sniff because chances are you are causing a DOS situation by duplicating the MAC address.
no need for a hub and most specially if you dont have the full control of the network premise... the most common technique to sniff between two hosts under the switch environment is the man in the middle attack technique... gratuitios arp is your friend here for arp poisoning....
Dev wrote:& So i duplicated the mac of the victim machine on my own machine.
dont do that and you will easily catch for that....
What i saw was this: ping packet drop rate for any of the two machines from a third machine
varied from 40 to almost 80 %. Also say telnet sessions to any of the two machines (which had now the same mac addresses) worked with notable 4-5 second lockups.
Further i could not ping the other machine from one of the duplicated
machines. (the last one is okay - it makes a lot of sense)
My premise is that the problem in connectivity is coming becoz the OS
does not fall back to half duplex mode when two machines take up the same mac address??
can anyone plz tell me about the behaviour. How do i set up mac
duplication in that case so that i can sniff data. it is pretty obvious that you dont understand how the communication of ethernet works.... so here it is... when a sender sends a data where the destination address is within its network segment, it is the mac address matters most... but when a sender sends a data where the destination address is outside its network segment, it is the ip address matters most... sending a data within its network segment takes only to know the mac address of the receiver... this is where address resolution protocol comes in... read the arp rfc... learn how the switch forward the ethernet frames if there are two or more the same mac address on different ports of a switch... and learn how the tcp/ip stack of a particular OS respond to multiple ethernet frames coming from the same mac address hosts... fooler.
Current thread:
- mac duplication Dev (Dec 12)
- Re: mac duplication Miles Stevenson (Dec 12)
- RE: mac duplication Burton M. Strauss III (Dec 12)
- RE: mac duplication Peter Moody (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Burton M. Strauss III (Dec 15)
- Re: mac duplication Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: mac duplication dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Peter Moody (Dec 15)
- Re: mac duplication Sam Baskinger (Dec 12)
- Re: mac duplication Jimi Thompson (Dec 13)
- Re: mac duplication fooler (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication David Gillett (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Dom De Vitto (Dec 15)
- Re: mac duplication Peter Moody (Dec 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mac duplication Boyer, G. T. IT2 ISSM Office (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Demar, Jeremy D CTM1 (CCDG12 Aug) (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Glenn_Everhart (Dec 15)
- RE: mac duplication Michael Wojcik (Dec 15)