Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
From: "Aditya" <adityald2 () gmx net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:17:04 +0530
the 1025 port is bound because the machine in win2k which has com enabled by default disable com and this will vanish aditya ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Coombs" <jasonc () science org> To: <vuln-dev () security-focus com> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:10 AM Subject: RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
However, port 1025 is still being bound by SYSTEM ... I have no idea why.
Current thread:
- Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Aditya (Aug 31)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Jason Coombs (Aug 31)
- Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Aditya (Aug 31)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Jason Coombs (Aug 31)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Thierry De Leeuw (Sep 02)
- Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Aditya (Aug 31)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Jason Coombs (Aug 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Cade Cairns (Aug 31)