RE: SECURITY CAMERA WAR DRIVING

[Steve Maks <smaks () verisign com>]

The NY Times had an article on this a bit ago:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/14/technology/14SPY.html

I've got some X10 equipment on its way to experiment with this.  There is
also the ICOM R-3 scanner that has a built-in LCD screen and can receive
2.4GHz video (http://www.icomamerica.com/receivers/handheld/icr3main.html).
I haven't heard many good things about this receiver, however.  The battery
lasts about an hour with the LCD screen on and apparently it can't receive
all the X10 camera frequencies.

There is a group of us on the NetStumbler (www.netstumbler.com) forums board
who are looking into this, you might want to stop by if you are interested.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Bartholomew Simpson [mailto:focusyne () yahoo com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:42 PM
To: vuln-dev () securityfocus com
Subject: SECURITY CAMERA WAR DRIVING


I assume that wireless security cameras have the same
problems as wireless access points?  If true "peeping
Toms" wouldn't have to get out of their cars.

BS


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com