Re: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement

[Vicne <vdh () nebula7 ath cx>]

Yea, but then it would be a lesser offence no?  I'm not to familiar with
the DMCA, or law for that matter, but wouldn't a simple name trademark
violation be less then a DMCA violation?

I don't think it would be to hard to catch people, it just takes a p2p
client and a simple search for their titles, then just write down the ip
addresses and report them.

But I am curious now, would they be able to build a case without
validating that the content is actually theirs, not just the name?


On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 05:41, vodka () intoxicate us wrote:
> Vicne said:
> > That could be porn you were hiding from your parents, so you renamed it
> > to movies they hate, so they wouldn't look at it.
>
> If that was the case...
>
> You're still using their copyrighted movie titles on your porn and
> distributing them as property of those movie companies.
>
> It's kinda like me taking bottles of water and putting "Coca Cola" labels on
> them, and giving them out for free.
>
> I wonder how the MPAA is catching people though.  Do they have like p2p
> spider bots or something?