Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

RE: possible AIM dos?


From: "Clarke, Matthew J" <CLARKE06 () morrisville edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:40:12 -0400

SOmeone does not need to send you a message though, attacks like this are
very popular against people who are "away". when you are away your aim
client automaticly responds to a IM allowing you to warn the person 3 times.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Sachs [mailto:matthewg () zevils com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:22 PM
To: vuln-dev () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: possible AIM dos?


On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:14:44PM -0400, John Scimone wrote:
After reading this outdated article regarding AOL Instant Messenger's
"warn" 
feature:

http://www.attrition.org/security/denial/w/aim-warn.dos.html

I began to wonder what type of restrictions were put on it.  Does anyone
know 
what is stopping someone from registering multiple screen names, then
sending 
warnings from each of those names, all targeted at the same user thus
keeping 
that user at a 100% warning level denying them the instant messenger
service 
for the most part? 
any thoughts are appreciated.
thanks.

In order to be able to warn someone, that person needs to have, say,
sent you an instant message.  You can only warn someone once for every
IM they send you.

-- 
Matthew Sachs   <matthewg () zevils com>  <matthewg () wombatbanana com>
http://www.zevils.com/ * GPG key: 0x600A0342 * PGP key: 0x93EA1151
#The original nonstandard deviant# (((T^E)%(PQ))^D)%(PQ) = RSA-NOP


Current thread: