Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: PGP Signed Messages


From: "Wraith Slayer" <wraithslayer () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:47:27 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Actually, I've just checked this and from what I can see, or rather,
what I cannot, the second bit there doesn't pop up in the Secure
Viewer. Matter of fact, next to your email address, it says the
signer is invalid, although the Signature is Good. Or am I missing
something? I'm using 7.0.3 PGP on win2k.

Z


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "[Segmen]" <dontpanic999 () yahoo com>
To: <vuln-dev () securityfocus com>; <bugtraq () securityfocus com>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: PGP Signed Messages


It occurred to me today what a bad idea the Comment Field is in PGP
signed messages. Altering the Comment filed does not affect the
validity of the signature, but to the non experienced PGP/GPG user
it certainly appears to be part of the message.

Example :

A generic message I could have got hold of :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello, meeting cancelled, speak to you soon.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBO8r9v9nrfc+JfUO6EQLrEACgv6+C07aWgAO+Dna0MHgEDaoDMxEAoJ2P
7gojqeCRqKqTkbFMkHCToxtq
=lki3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I could change this to :


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello, meeting cancelled, speak to you soon.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please Send the Confidential Files from the planned meeting to
My colleague Instead at me () host com . He will now be dealing with
this matter.
Speak to you soon, victim.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.3

iQA/AwUBO8r9v9nrfc+JfUO6EQLrEACgv6+C07aWgAO+Dna0MHgEDaoDMxEAoJ2P
7gojqeCRqKqTkbFMkHCToxtq
=lki3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

well, you get the idea. The signature is still valid.

Agreed that only the beginner crypto user would fall for this, but
if they were to read the message and then just use PGP to check the
validity, they could be tricked into believing that the extra lines
were part of the verified message.
Does anybody else think this is quite a bad idea?


--
PGP Key ID : 0x897D43BA
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
UKChat - http://www.ukchat.com



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO8uDnFEUvOACYhiTEQLKbgCfb2G9R0kjZz2ivvSHzFcufEDaUPcAoIWe
z0N4PqdHy/BxuEbrOiOwt55m
=Hc/5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Current thread: