Re: smk

[Dan Kaminsky <dankamin () CISCO COM>]

> I haven't heard any chat about this from Stray Mountain Kitty about a NAT
> exploit.
> http://www.cryptography.ws/smk/smk-vun.001.001.htm
>
> Has anyone have any ideas or heard about this?
>
> Viper Team
> viper () bea com

To simplify, the author of this article believes that if your home network
is configured to route outgoing packets with a destination address of
127.0.0.1, every machine on every network behind any NAT that's been
configured with an address of 127.0.0.1 will respond.

Lets just say this guy doesn't understand routing all too well.

--Dan "Sets His Linux Box To 204.71.200.68 And Takes Over Yahoo" Kaminsky