Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: Possible DOS in Bind 8.2.2-P5 (my fault, sorry)


From: Mariusz Marcinkiewicz <tmogg () AGSMEDIA PL>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:25:30 +0100

On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Mariusz Marcinkiewicz wrote:

Doesn't work on RH6.2 :

that's not true...

---
Nov  8 12:54:25 x named[2668]: approved ZXFR from [10.0.0.1].3106 for "y.pl"
Nov  8 12:54:25 x named[2668]: unsupported XFR (type ZXFR) of "y.pl" (IN) to
 [10.0.0.1].3106
---

I posted it too fast. About 1 hour later named died:

Nov  8 13:55:18 x named[2668]: rm_datum: DB_F_ACTIVE not set
Nov  8 13:55:18 x named[2668]: rm_datum: DB_F_ACTIVE not set
Nov  8 14:00:09 x named[26729]: hint zone "" (IN) loaded (serial 0)

sorry for 1st wrong opinion, but i didn't see DOS which gives an
effect after so long time... sorry once again.. RH's bind *IS*
vuln.


--
 _____________________________________________________________
 Mariusz Marcinkiewicz [*] Admin @ AGS NewMedia <tmogg () ags pl>
 HERT:Security Specialist <tmogg () hert org> http://www.hert.org
 The Member Of GNU Generation @ TESO Team http://teso.scene.at


Current thread: