Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Aureate Software
From: m_a_n_i_a_c_ () HOTMAIL COM (Maniac .)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 17:39:37 GMT
This issue was discussed to some detail on the Win2K Security Advice mailing list (archived at www.ntsecurity.net). And it seems that the majority of people agree with this. Another point to mention is that if you de-install the software package that installed Aureate, a lot of the DLLs that are installed for Aureate to function are NOT removed from your system. How can these people install something on the system without notifying users they are doing so? If a usefull program like L0phtcrack is listed as a Trojan by AV vendors why isn't this. It has much of the same characteristics of a trojan. Just my .02$
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark L. Jackson wrote about Aureate Software, commenting thus: *snipped*In conclusion: Maybe this software is trustable, I don't know. Seems to me that if someone had dropped this on your system with out installing it with a known package it would be called a trojan. I reallydo notsee the reason to call this anything else. Like to know what others think.
-==-Man!ac-==- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: Aureate Software Maniac . (Mar 09)