tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?
From: Michael Tuexen via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:47:58 -0400 (EDT)
--- Begin Message --- From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen () lurchi franken de>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:49:07 +0100
On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf () sandelman ca> wrote: Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote:Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team: https://github.com/pcapngwith one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a "the-tcpdump-group" team:https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group with repositories for libpcap, tcpdump, and the tcpdump.org Web site.It makes sense to me to keep those specifications on a site such as GitHub; GitHub comes to mind first because that's where pcapng currently is.1) add them as repositories to the pcapng team;1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:...Were we to rename it, I don't know what would be a good new name.I'm good with pcapng, because I also have no other suggestion. I would like to restart the opsawg work on an IETF specification for this.I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful. There were not very interested in defining a file format... Maybe things have changed, but I don't know. Best regards Michael-- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF () sandelman ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 21)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Mar 21)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Mario Rugiero via tcpdump-workers (Mar 21)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 21)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 21)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 22)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Mar 22)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 26)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 26)
- Message not available
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 31)
- Re: New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Tuexen via tcpdump-workers (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Mar 22)