tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: proposed change: make tcpdump -n and tcpdump -nn behave differently


From: Rick Jones <jonesrick () google com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:04:16 -0700

My proverbial two cents is that is changing the semantics of an option,
semantics which go back literally decades.  New semantics should be
associated with new options.

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:48 AM Denis Ovsienko <denis () ovsienko info> wrote:

Hello list.

At https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/pull/702 there is a
simple proposed change, which seems to be an improvement:
-------------------------
Subject: Introduce -nn option

This changes the semantics on -n option so only namelookups are skipped.
Port
numbers *are* translated to their string representations. Option -nn then
has
the same semantics as -n had originally.

This is a partial upstreaming of tcpdump-4.9.2-3 used in CentOs 7.5.
-------------------------

If anybody sees how this change isn't an improvement, please make your
point on the list.

Thank you.

--
    Denis Ovsienko


_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Current thread: